The NDF degradability (d(NDF)) of hays measured by an in situ method (nylon bag technique) was compared with in vitro fermentation, using the Daisy(II) incubator (Ankom(R), Tech. Co., Fairport, NY, USA). Eighteen hays were produced from mountain areas (about 700 m.s.l.) from plots subjected to different cutting frequencies (two to four cuts per season) and types of N fertilisation (slurry and slurry plus mineral). Hay samples from each cut were incubated (in situ) in the rumens of three cows (incubation times: 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48 and 72 h; sample weight: 15 mg/cm(2) of free bag area) or inserted (in vitro) into three different digestion jars Oar volume: 2 1; bag size 5 cm x 3 cm; sample weight: 250 mg per bag) that were placed into the Daisy(11) incubator for 48 h. The forages showed large variation in effective d(NDF) (assumed rumen turn over rate: 3% per hour) which ranged from 38 to 43% for hays with two cuts to 58-65% for the hays with four cuts per season. The d(NDF) obtained in situ (Y, effective) and in vitro (X, after 48 h of incubation) were highly correlated (P < 0.01) and the regression equation was Y = 0.74(+/-0.05)X + 6.39(+/-2.90), n = 18, S.D. = +/-1.96, r(2) = 0.94. The variability (coefficient of variation, CV) of the in vitro measurements (among jar repeatability) was 2.8%, which is close to that generally found for some chemical analyses of feedstuffs and lower than that obtained for the in situ measures (among cow repeatability, CV: 3.7%). The Daisy(II) incubator produces repeatable in vitro d(NDF) data which are highly related to those obtainable with the reference in situ procedure. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

NDF degradability of hays measured in situ and in vitro

SPANGHERO, Mauro;
2003-01-01

Abstract

The NDF degradability (d(NDF)) of hays measured by an in situ method (nylon bag technique) was compared with in vitro fermentation, using the Daisy(II) incubator (Ankom(R), Tech. Co., Fairport, NY, USA). Eighteen hays were produced from mountain areas (about 700 m.s.l.) from plots subjected to different cutting frequencies (two to four cuts per season) and types of N fertilisation (slurry and slurry plus mineral). Hay samples from each cut were incubated (in situ) in the rumens of three cows (incubation times: 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48 and 72 h; sample weight: 15 mg/cm(2) of free bag area) or inserted (in vitro) into three different digestion jars Oar volume: 2 1; bag size 5 cm x 3 cm; sample weight: 250 mg per bag) that were placed into the Daisy(11) incubator for 48 h. The forages showed large variation in effective d(NDF) (assumed rumen turn over rate: 3% per hour) which ranged from 38 to 43% for hays with two cuts to 58-65% for the hays with four cuts per season. The d(NDF) obtained in situ (Y, effective) and in vitro (X, after 48 h of incubation) were highly correlated (P < 0.01) and the regression equation was Y = 0.74(+/-0.05)X + 6.39(+/-2.90), n = 18, S.D. = +/-1.96, r(2) = 0.94. The variability (coefficient of variation, CV) of the in vitro measurements (among jar repeatability) was 2.8%, which is close to that generally found for some chemical analyses of feedstuffs and lower than that obtained for the in situ measures (among cow repeatability, CV: 3.7%). The Daisy(II) incubator produces repeatable in vitro d(NDF) data which are highly related to those obtainable with the reference in situ procedure. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Spanghero NDFD 2003.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 80.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
80.21 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/667825
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 42
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact