Traditionally, the core of a Terminological Knowledge Representation System (TKRS) consists of a so-called TBox, where concepts are introduced, and an ABox, where facts about individuals are stated in terms of these concepts. This design has a drawback because in most applications the TBox has to meet two functions at a time: on the one hand, similar to a database schema, framelike structures with typing information are introduced through primitive concepts and primitive roles; on the other hand, views on the objects in the knowledge base are provided through defined concepts. We propose to account for this conceptual separation by partitioning the TBox into two components for primitive and defined concepts, which we call the schema and the view part. We envision the two parts to differ with respect to the language for concepts, the statements allowed, and the semantics. We argue that by this separation we achieve more conceptual clarity about the role of primitive and defined concepts and the semantics of terminological cycles. Moreover, three case studies show the computational benefits to be gained from the refined architecture.

Refining the structure of terminological systems: terminology = schema + views

SCHAERF, Andrea
1994-01-01

Abstract

Traditionally, the core of a Terminological Knowledge Representation System (TKRS) consists of a so-called TBox, where concepts are introduced, and an ABox, where facts about individuals are stated in terms of these concepts. This design has a drawback because in most applications the TBox has to meet two functions at a time: on the one hand, similar to a database schema, framelike structures with typing information are introduced through primitive concepts and primitive roles; on the other hand, views on the objects in the knowledge base are provided through defined concepts. We propose to account for this conceptual separation by partitioning the TBox into two components for primitive and defined concepts, which we call the schema and the view part. We envision the two parts to differ with respect to the language for concepts, the statements allowed, and the semantics. We argue that by this separation we achieve more conceptual clarity about the role of primitive and defined concepts and the semantics of terminological cycles. Moreover, three case studies show the computational benefits to be gained from the refined architecture.
1994
0262611023
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/673123
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact