The aim of this paper is to explore the beginning of the linguistic debate in Rome during the Republican Age. Retracing the evidence on the first Roman grammarians offered by Suetonius in De grammaticis et rhetoribus, we analyse the progressive development of the grammatical discipline from a role of ancilla poesis to an autonomous field of study. The poets Livius Andronicus and Ennius are remembered by Suetonius, gramm. 1, 1-2 as the first to have provided a contribution to the studium grammaticae. We discuss this contribution in detail and add similar hints from Naevius, Accius and Lucilius. We also highlight the development of a theory and practice of etymology in Aelius Stilo, up to the dispute between anomaly and analogy. Moreover, our reading leads to the revaluation of ancient grammarians neglected until now, such as Antonius Gnipho, Valerius Cato, and above all Staberius Eros, an analogist who prefigures some of the concepts that will find a full arrangement in Varro’s De lingua Latina. Here we point out a first definition of the Latin concepts of inflection, derivation, as well as the intuition of the universality of grammar.
Linguistic Thought in Rome before Varro
Antonella Duso;Renato Oniga
2020-01-01
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the beginning of the linguistic debate in Rome during the Republican Age. Retracing the evidence on the first Roman grammarians offered by Suetonius in De grammaticis et rhetoribus, we analyse the progressive development of the grammatical discipline from a role of ancilla poesis to an autonomous field of study. The poets Livius Andronicus and Ennius are remembered by Suetonius, gramm. 1, 1-2 as the first to have provided a contribution to the studium grammaticae. We discuss this contribution in detail and add similar hints from Naevius, Accius and Lucilius. We also highlight the development of a theory and practice of etymology in Aelius Stilo, up to the dispute between anomaly and analogy. Moreover, our reading leads to the revaluation of ancient grammarians neglected until now, such as Antonius Gnipho, Valerius Cato, and above all Staberius Eros, an analogist who prefigures some of the concepts that will find a full arrangement in Varro’s De lingua Latina. Here we point out a first definition of the Latin concepts of inflection, derivation, as well as the intuition of the universality of grammar.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2020_Duso_Oniga_pdf_editoriale.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: Articolo completo
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Non pubblico
Dimensione
4.44 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.44 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.