In the present work, a seismic analysis was performed in advance on a limestone rock slope (height = 150 m) outcropping along the Tagliamento River valley, in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, north-eastern Italy. The analysed slope is characterised by strong rock mass damage, thus resulting in a critical stability condition (unstable volume = 110,000-200,000 m3). The seismic analysis was performed adopting the 2D finite difference method (FDM) and employing both a pseudo-static approach and a non-linear dynamic approach. Model outcomes demonstrate that the seismic motion induces internal, localised ruptures within the rock mass. Some important differences in the mechanical behaviour of the rock slope were highlighted, depending on the specific modelling approach assumed. When adopting a pseudo-static approach, the slope failure occurs for PGA values ranging between 0.056 g and 0.124 g, depending on the different initial static stability condition assumed for the slope (Strength Reduction Factor SRF = 1.00-1.15). According to the non-linear dynamic approach, the slope failure is achieved for PGA values varying between 0.056 g and 0.213 g. Pre-collapse slope displacements calculated with the pseudo-static approach (12-15 cm) are much more greater than those obtained through the non-linear dynamic approach (0.5-3 mm). The modelling results obtained through the non-linear dynamic analysis also testify that the seismic topographic amplification is 1.5 times the target acceleration at the slope face and 2.5 times the target acceleration at the slope toe.

Seismic Analysis of a Limestone Rock Slope through Numerical Modelling: Pseudo-Static vs. Non-Linear Dynamic Approach

Bolla A.;Paronuzzi P.
2021-01-01

Abstract

In the present work, a seismic analysis was performed in advance on a limestone rock slope (height = 150 m) outcropping along the Tagliamento River valley, in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, north-eastern Italy. The analysed slope is characterised by strong rock mass damage, thus resulting in a critical stability condition (unstable volume = 110,000-200,000 m3). The seismic analysis was performed adopting the 2D finite difference method (FDM) and employing both a pseudo-static approach and a non-linear dynamic approach. Model outcomes demonstrate that the seismic motion induces internal, localised ruptures within the rock mass. Some important differences in the mechanical behaviour of the rock slope were highlighted, depending on the specific modelling approach assumed. When adopting a pseudo-static approach, the slope failure occurs for PGA values ranging between 0.056 g and 0.124 g, depending on the different initial static stability condition assumed for the slope (Strength Reduction Factor SRF = 1.00-1.15). According to the non-linear dynamic approach, the slope failure is achieved for PGA values varying between 0.056 g and 0.213 g. Pre-collapse slope displacements calculated with the pseudo-static approach (12-15 cm) are much more greater than those obtained through the non-linear dynamic approach (0.5-3 mm). The modelling results obtained through the non-linear dynamic analysis also testify that the seismic topographic amplification is 1.5 times the target acceleration at the slope face and 2.5 times the target acceleration at the slope toe.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
74_b1.docx - pdf.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 5.63 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.63 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/1217480
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact