The traditional paradigms of rule-making, which hinge on political law, increasingly show their inadequacy in the real world. Indeed, the growing weight assumed by technique in rule-making is an evident sign of this. The essay strives to pinpoint a model of standardization (defined as evidence-based) which integrates technique into the normative paradigm while maintaining the centrality of the political decision-maker. From a legal standpoint, the Author believes this model could be the answer to the dilemma of complexity, which affects also to the sources of law’s system.
Innovazione tecnologica e fonti del diritto
Elena D'Orlando
2023-01-01
Abstract
The traditional paradigms of rule-making, which hinge on political law, increasingly show their inadequacy in the real world. Indeed, the growing weight assumed by technique in rule-making is an evident sign of this. The essay strives to pinpoint a model of standardization (defined as evidence-based) which integrates technique into the normative paradigm while maintaining the centrality of the political decision-maker. From a legal standpoint, the Author believes this model could be the answer to the dilemma of complexity, which affects also to the sources of law’s system.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Napoli.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print
Licenza:
Non pubblico
Dimensione
142.07 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
142.07 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.