This essay aims to tackle the meaning of the concept of illusions in relation to the terms “appearance” and “deception of the senses”. We intend to examine some cases of illusion to show how the idea of “a sensorial deception” is already a judgment about an experience: indeed, the senses themselves do not deceive. Deception implies an epistemological position on reality. The same can be said of the relationship between appearance and reality: the appearance of illusions, as compared to reality, is an epistemological question rather than an ontological one. Illusions are part of reality and hence they convey a sense of it.

Ontology of illusion and the genesis of meaning

Luca Taddio
2020-01-01

Abstract

This essay aims to tackle the meaning of the concept of illusions in relation to the terms “appearance” and “deception of the senses”. We intend to examine some cases of illusion to show how the idea of “a sensorial deception” is already a judgment about an experience: indeed, the senses themselves do not deceive. Deception implies an epistemological position on reality. The same can be said of the relationship between appearance and reality: the appearance of illusions, as compared to reality, is an epistemological question rather than an ontological one. Illusions are part of reality and hence they convey a sense of it.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1. Ontology of illusion and the genesis of meaning Ágalma.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: "Articolo principale"
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 217.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
217.21 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/1187101
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact