This work compares the microstructure and corrosion resistance of 316 L stainless steel samples prepared using two different additive manufacturing methods: selective laser melting (SLM), and laser metal deposition (LMD). A wrought material was used as reference. The specimens showed marked differences in their microstructure, as a result of the specific manufacturing conditions. All samples displayed similar corrosion potential and passive current density values. However, variations were seen in their potential passive range (SLM > LMD > Wrought). The wider passivity of the SLM specimen can be associated with its finer microstructure, which leads to a more stable native oxide.
Microstructure and corrosion behavior of 316L stainless steel prepared using different additive manufacturing methods: A comparative study bringing insights into the impact of microstructure on their passivity
Andreatta F.;
2020-01-01
Abstract
This work compares the microstructure and corrosion resistance of 316 L stainless steel samples prepared using two different additive manufacturing methods: selective laser melting (SLM), and laser metal deposition (LMD). A wrought material was used as reference. The specimens showed marked differences in their microstructure, as a result of the specific manufacturing conditions. All samples displayed similar corrosion potential and passive current density values. However, variations were seen in their potential passive range (SLM > LMD > Wrought). The wider passivity of the SLM specimen can be associated with its finer microstructure, which leads to a more stable native oxide.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S0010938X20311811-main.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Non pubblico
Dimensione
3.59 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.59 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
