PurposeIncreasing prevalence of candidemia in Internal Medicine wards (IMWs) has been reported in recent years, but risk factors for candida bloodstream infection in patients admitted to IMW may differ from those known in other settings. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and define a prediction rule for the early recognition of the risk of candidemia in IMW inpatients.MethodsThis was a multicentric, retrospective, observational case-control study on non-neutropenic patients with candidemia admitted to IMWs of four large Italian Hospitals. Each eligible patient with candidemia (case) was matched to a control with bacteremia. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed.ResultsOverall, 300 patients (150 cases and 150 controls) were enrolled. The following factors were associated with an increased risk of candidemia and weighted to build a score: total parenteral nutrition (OR 2.45, p=0.008; 1 point); central venous catheter (OR 2.19, p=0.031; 1 point); peripherally inserted central catheter (OR 5.63, p<0.0001; 3 points), antibiotic treatment prior (OR 2.06; p=0.059; 1 point) and during hospitalization (OR2.38, p=0.033; 1 point); neurological disability (OR 2.25, p=0.01; 1 point); and previous hospitalization within 3 months (OR 1.56, p=0.163; 1 point). At ROC curve analysis, a final score4 showed 84% sensitivity, 76% specificity, and 80% accuracy in predicting the risk of candidemia.ConclusionsThe proposed scoring system showed to be a simple and highly performing tool in distinguishing bloodstream infections due to Candida and bacteria in patients admitted to IMW. The proposed rule might help to reduce delay in empirical treatment and improve appropriateness in antifungal prescription in septic patients.

A prediction rule for early recognition of patients with candidemia in Internal Medicine: results from an Italian, multicentric, case-control study

Sozio E;Tascini C
2018-01-01

Abstract

PurposeIncreasing prevalence of candidemia in Internal Medicine wards (IMWs) has been reported in recent years, but risk factors for candida bloodstream infection in patients admitted to IMW may differ from those known in other settings. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and define a prediction rule for the early recognition of the risk of candidemia in IMW inpatients.MethodsThis was a multicentric, retrospective, observational case-control study on non-neutropenic patients with candidemia admitted to IMWs of four large Italian Hospitals. Each eligible patient with candidemia (case) was matched to a control with bacteremia. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed.ResultsOverall, 300 patients (150 cases and 150 controls) were enrolled. The following factors were associated with an increased risk of candidemia and weighted to build a score: total parenteral nutrition (OR 2.45, p=0.008; 1 point); central venous catheter (OR 2.19, p=0.031; 1 point); peripherally inserted central catheter (OR 5.63, p<0.0001; 3 points), antibiotic treatment prior (OR 2.06; p=0.059; 1 point) and during hospitalization (OR2.38, p=0.033; 1 point); neurological disability (OR 2.25, p=0.01; 1 point); and previous hospitalization within 3 months (OR 1.56, p=0.163; 1 point). At ROC curve analysis, a final score4 showed 84% sensitivity, 76% specificity, and 80% accuracy in predicting the risk of candidemia.ConclusionsThe proposed scoring system showed to be a simple and highly performing tool in distinguishing bloodstream infections due to Candida and bacteria in patients admitted to IMW. The proposed rule might help to reduce delay in empirical treatment and improve appropriateness in antifungal prescription in septic patients.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sozio2018.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 825.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
825.82 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/1198810
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact