Objectives: To evaluate the entity of extrapyramidal signs, characterize them and evaluate the dynamics of change by the mean of MDS-UPDRS-III in iNPH patients after the TT to determine if this tool may help the diagnosis of iNPH and the identification of candidates for Ventriculo-Peritoneal Shunting. Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected data from 120 patients with the initial diagnosis of possible iNPH; they underwent neurological examination by the means of MDS-UPDRS-III and other scales before and after Tap Test (TT). They were then classified as defined iNPH (57), probable iNPH (35), and NOT-iNPH (28) based on the clinical response after the Tap Test and VPS. Results: After the Tap Test, defined and probable iNPH groups improved by 3.35 (2.57–4.12, p < 0.001) and 3.43 (2.43–4.4, p < 0.001) points on MDS-UPDRS-III respectively; NOT-iNPH did not improve significantly on MDS-UPDRS-III and on any other variable studies. Defined iNPH also shifted significantly from asymmetric prevalence of symptoms to a more symmetric form (from 70% before to 57% after). Conclusion: extrapyramidal signs improved significantly after the Tap Test in definite and probable iNPH patients. MDS-UPDRS-III may be a useful complementary tool in the diagnosis of iNPH and identification of candidates for Ventriculo-Peritoneal Shunting.
MDS-UDPRS-III in the diagnosis of idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and identification of candidates for Ventriculo-Peritoneal Shunting surgery. Results from a retrospective large cohort of patients
Piccolo D.;Gigli G. L.;Valente M.
2023-01-01
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the entity of extrapyramidal signs, characterize them and evaluate the dynamics of change by the mean of MDS-UPDRS-III in iNPH patients after the TT to determine if this tool may help the diagnosis of iNPH and the identification of candidates for Ventriculo-Peritoneal Shunting. Materials and methods: We retrospectively collected data from 120 patients with the initial diagnosis of possible iNPH; they underwent neurological examination by the means of MDS-UPDRS-III and other scales before and after Tap Test (TT). They were then classified as defined iNPH (57), probable iNPH (35), and NOT-iNPH (28) based on the clinical response after the Tap Test and VPS. Results: After the Tap Test, defined and probable iNPH groups improved by 3.35 (2.57–4.12, p < 0.001) and 3.43 (2.43–4.4, p < 0.001) points on MDS-UPDRS-III respectively; NOT-iNPH did not improve significantly on MDS-UPDRS-III and on any other variable studies. Defined iNPH also shifted significantly from asymmetric prevalence of symptoms to a more symmetric form (from 70% before to 57% after). Conclusion: extrapyramidal signs improved significantly after the Tap Test in definite and probable iNPH patients. MDS-UPDRS-III may be a useful complementary tool in the diagnosis of iNPH and identification of candidates for Ventriculo-Peritoneal Shunting.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0022510X22003987-main.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Non pubblico
Dimensione
1 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.