Objective: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the malignancy most frequently associated with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) and can trigger different antibody responses against intracellular (Hu) or neuronal surface (GABABR) antigens. Our aim was to clarify whether the genomic and transcriptomic features of SCLC are different in patients with anti-GABABR or anti-Hu PNS compared with SCLC without PNS. Methods: A total of 76 SCLC tumor samples were collected: 34 anti-Hu, 14 anti-GABABR, and 28 SCLC without PNS. The study consisted of 4 steps: (1) pathological confirmation; (2) next generation sequencing using a panel of 98 genes, including those encoding the autoantibodies targets ELAVL1-4, GABBR1-2, and KCTD16; (3) genome-wide copy number variation (CNV); and (4) whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing. Results: CNV analysis revealed that patients with anti-GABABR PNS commonly have a gain in chromosome 5q, which contains KCTD16, whereas anti-Hu and control patients often harbor a loss. No significantly different number of mutations regarding any onconeural genes was observed. Conversely, the transcriptomic profile of SCLC was different, and the differentially expressed genes allowed effective clustering of the samples into 3 groups, reflecting the antibody-based classification, with an overexpression of KCTD16 specific to anti-GABABR PNS. Pathway analysis revealed that tumors of patients with anti-GABABR encephalitis were enriched in B-cell signatures, as opposed to those of patients with anti-Hu, in which T-cell- and interferon-γ-related signatures were overexpressed. Interpretation: SCLC genetic and transcriptomic features differentiate anti-GABABR, anti-Hu, and non-PNS tumors. The role of KCTD16 appears to be pivotal in the tumor immune tolerance breakdown of anti-GABABR PNS. ANN NEUROL 2023.

Different Genetic Signatures of Small-Cell Lung Cancer Characterize Anti-GABABR and Anti-Hu Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes

Vogrig A.;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Objective: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the malignancy most frequently associated with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) and can trigger different antibody responses against intracellular (Hu) or neuronal surface (GABABR) antigens. Our aim was to clarify whether the genomic and transcriptomic features of SCLC are different in patients with anti-GABABR or anti-Hu PNS compared with SCLC without PNS. Methods: A total of 76 SCLC tumor samples were collected: 34 anti-Hu, 14 anti-GABABR, and 28 SCLC without PNS. The study consisted of 4 steps: (1) pathological confirmation; (2) next generation sequencing using a panel of 98 genes, including those encoding the autoantibodies targets ELAVL1-4, GABBR1-2, and KCTD16; (3) genome-wide copy number variation (CNV); and (4) whole-transcriptome RNA sequencing. Results: CNV analysis revealed that patients with anti-GABABR PNS commonly have a gain in chromosome 5q, which contains KCTD16, whereas anti-Hu and control patients often harbor a loss. No significantly different number of mutations regarding any onconeural genes was observed. Conversely, the transcriptomic profile of SCLC was different, and the differentially expressed genes allowed effective clustering of the samples into 3 groups, reflecting the antibody-based classification, with an overexpression of KCTD16 specific to anti-GABABR PNS. Pathway analysis revealed that tumors of patients with anti-GABABR encephalitis were enriched in B-cell signatures, as opposed to those of patients with anti-Hu, in which T-cell- and interferon-γ-related signatures were overexpressed. Interpretation: SCLC genetic and transcriptomic features differentiate anti-GABABR, anti-Hu, and non-PNS tumors. The role of KCTD16 appears to be pivotal in the tumor immune tolerance breakdown of anti-GABABR PNS. ANN NEUROL 2023.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/1262770
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact