The authors regret for the inclusion of a wrongTable 3 in this paper and for the correspondent section in the results. Table 3 and results that should have been published are as follows. Unfinished Nursing Care Reasons At the factor level, differences emerged across countries (p < 0.001), with communication issues (12.57 in Italy, 15.89 in Slovakia, 19.78 in Türkiye) as the first reason for unfinished care, followed by the lack of the material resources availability (7.50, 10.66, and 12.33, respectively) and by the issues in nursing aides’ supervision (7.16, 10.15, and 11.83, respectively). Also, at the item level statistical differences emerged across countries (p < 0.001), with the most significant reason in all being an inadequate number of nurses (3.05, 4.32, and 4.23 out of 5, respectively). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. ____________________________ DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104100
Corrigendum to “Unfinished nursing care occurrence, priority order and reasons as perceived by nursing students: An international study” [Nurse Educ. Pract. 79 (2024) 104100] (Nurse Education in Practice (2024) 79, (S1471595324002294), (10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104100))
Chiappinotto S.
;Bayram A.
;Grassetti L.;Palese A.
2025-01-01
Abstract
The authors regret for the inclusion of a wrongTable 3 in this paper and for the correspondent section in the results. Table 3 and results that should have been published are as follows. Unfinished Nursing Care Reasons At the factor level, differences emerged across countries (p < 0.001), with communication issues (12.57 in Italy, 15.89 in Slovakia, 19.78 in Türkiye) as the first reason for unfinished care, followed by the lack of the material resources availability (7.50, 10.66, and 12.33, respectively) and by the issues in nursing aides’ supervision (7.16, 10.15, and 11.83, respectively). Also, at the item level statistical differences emerged across countries (p < 0.001), with the most significant reason in all being an inadequate number of nurses (3.05, 4.32, and 4.23 out of 5, respectively). The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. ____________________________ DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104100File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S1471595325000265-main.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
293.35 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
293.35 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.