Background and ObjectivesDuring the recovery phase of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, up to 25% of relapses have been reported. Herein, we aimed to clinically characterize these relapses, analyze potential clinical predictors during the first episode, and evaluate the impact of immunotherapy in their occurrence.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study of patients diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis relapses between January 2007 and June 2022 at the French Reference Center for Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis with a follow-up longer than 1 year.ResultsAmong 507 patients, 49 (9%) presented relapses after a median time of 720 days (range 149-8,280) and a median follow-up of 1752 days (range 390-9,229 days, interquartile range 1760 days). A total of 36 patients (73%) experienced 1 relapse, 9 (18%) had 2, and 4 (8%) had 3 relapses. Most patients presented an isolated core symptom (25/45, 55%). Relapses were less severe than the first episode, as reflected by a lower maximal modified Rankin Scale (median 5, range 3-5, vs median 3, range 0-6; p = 0.0001). At the first episode, patients experiencing relapses had shorter intensive care unit stays (22 days; vs 39 days; p = 0.04). In addition, presenting CSF pleocytosis >20 white blood cell decreased the risk of relapse by 71% (HR 0.29; CI 0.13-0.66; p = 0.003), and having a paraneoplastic etiology decreased the risk by 68% (HR 0.32; CI 0.12-0.87; p = 0.02). Moreover, during the first episode, they were treated less frequently with first-line (39/49, 79%, vs 190/197, 96%; p = 0.0001) and second-line immunotherapies (20/49, 40%, vs 142/197, 72%; p = 0.0001) and more frequently with delay >30 days (20/38, 52%, vs 58/185, 31%; p = 0.01) and >60 days (10/20, 50%, vs 39/138, 28%; p = 0.04), respectively. In addition, administering rituximab during the first episode with a delay <60 days decreased the risk of relapse by 60% (HR 0.40; CI 0.19-0.84; p = 0.01).DiscussionRelapses of anti-NMDAR encephalitis are uncommon, mostly monosymptomatic, and less severe than the first episode. At onset, presenting CSF pleocytosis or an underlying tumor decreases the risk of relapses. In addition, the early administration of first-line and second-line immunotherapies, particularly rituximab, could protect against further relapses.

Relapses in Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis: Clinical Characterization and Predictive Features

Vogrig A.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesDuring the recovery phase of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, up to 25% of relapses have been reported. Herein, we aimed to clinically characterize these relapses, analyze potential clinical predictors during the first episode, and evaluate the impact of immunotherapy in their occurrence.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study of patients diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis relapses between January 2007 and June 2022 at the French Reference Center for Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis with a follow-up longer than 1 year.ResultsAmong 507 patients, 49 (9%) presented relapses after a median time of 720 days (range 149-8,280) and a median follow-up of 1752 days (range 390-9,229 days, interquartile range 1760 days). A total of 36 patients (73%) experienced 1 relapse, 9 (18%) had 2, and 4 (8%) had 3 relapses. Most patients presented an isolated core symptom (25/45, 55%). Relapses were less severe than the first episode, as reflected by a lower maximal modified Rankin Scale (median 5, range 3-5, vs median 3, range 0-6; p = 0.0001). At the first episode, patients experiencing relapses had shorter intensive care unit stays (22 days; vs 39 days; p = 0.04). In addition, presenting CSF pleocytosis >20 white blood cell decreased the risk of relapse by 71% (HR 0.29; CI 0.13-0.66; p = 0.003), and having a paraneoplastic etiology decreased the risk by 68% (HR 0.32; CI 0.12-0.87; p = 0.02). Moreover, during the first episode, they were treated less frequently with first-line (39/49, 79%, vs 190/197, 96%; p = 0.0001) and second-line immunotherapies (20/49, 40%, vs 142/197, 72%; p = 0.0001) and more frequently with delay >30 days (20/38, 52%, vs 58/185, 31%; p = 0.01) and >60 days (10/20, 50%, vs 39/138, 28%; p = 0.04), respectively. In addition, administering rituximab during the first episode with a delay <60 days decreased the risk of relapse by 60% (HR 0.40; CI 0.19-0.84; p = 0.01).DiscussionRelapses of anti-NMDAR encephalitis are uncommon, mostly monosymptomatic, and less severe than the first episode. At onset, presenting CSF pleocytosis or an underlying tumor decreases the risk of relapses. In addition, the early administration of first-line and second-line immunotherapies, particularly rituximab, could protect against further relapses.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ciano-petersen-et-al-2025-relapses-in-anti-nmdar-encephalitis.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 597.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
597.97 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/1309524
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact