Background and aim: Current data regarding the effect of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) with concomitant malignancy remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVT in patients with AIS and concomitant active cancer. Methods: The ITACA-stroke study was a retrospective observational study based on prospective registries of a multicentre international collaboration. Patients with a diagnosis of active cancer and AIS, treated or not with IVT, were enrolled. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for functional outcomes (mortality and good functional outcome) and haemorrhagic events at 90 days. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis compared IVT and no-IVT patients. Results: A total of 521 patients were included, 225 were treated with IVT and 296 were not treated with IVT. IVT was directly correlated with good functional outcome (OR: 2.56, 95% CI 1.45–4.52, p = 0.001), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) (OR: 4.85, 95% CI: 2.09–11.22, p < 0.001) any haemorrhagic event (OR: 4.13, 95% CI: 1.99–8.57, p < 0.001), and inversely correlated with mortality (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22–0.74, p = 0.003). In the PSM comparison, IVT was directly associated with good functional outcome (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.16–3.77, p = 0.014) and inversely correlated with mortality (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15–0.64, p = 0.001), but was not directly associated with haemorrhagic outcomes. Conclusions: Treatment with IVT could be beneficial in patients with AIS and active cancer in terms of functional outcome and mortality. An association between IVT and the risk of haemorrhagic events was less clearly defined in this sample.

Intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and active cancer (the ITACA-stroke study)

Merlino G.;Sperotto R.;Cella A.;Valente M.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background and aim: Current data regarding the effect of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) with concomitant malignancy remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVT in patients with AIS and concomitant active cancer. Methods: The ITACA-stroke study was a retrospective observational study based on prospective registries of a multicentre international collaboration. Patients with a diagnosis of active cancer and AIS, treated or not with IVT, were enrolled. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors for functional outcomes (mortality and good functional outcome) and haemorrhagic events at 90 days. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis compared IVT and no-IVT patients. Results: A total of 521 patients were included, 225 were treated with IVT and 296 were not treated with IVT. IVT was directly correlated with good functional outcome (OR: 2.56, 95% CI 1.45–4.52, p = 0.001), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) (OR: 4.85, 95% CI: 2.09–11.22, p < 0.001) any haemorrhagic event (OR: 4.13, 95% CI: 1.99–8.57, p < 0.001), and inversely correlated with mortality (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22–0.74, p = 0.003). In the PSM comparison, IVT was directly associated with good functional outcome (OR: 2.09, 95% CI: 1.16–3.77, p = 0.014) and inversely correlated with mortality (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15–0.64, p = 0.001), but was not directly associated with haemorrhagic outcomes. Conclusions: Treatment with IVT could be beneficial in patients with AIS and active cancer in terms of functional outcome and mortality. An association between IVT and the risk of haemorrhagic events was less clearly defined in this sample.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s00415-025-13458-6.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 655.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
655.03 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/1317908
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact