Research on cross-border micro-regionalism has proliferated in the last three decades. Much of this research is undertheorized and Eurocentric in outlook. Addressing this problem, our article follows calls to establish a Global International Relations research perspective that also incorporates non-Western cultural traditions and historical trajectories in theory building. We demonstrate that Hooghe and Marks's multi-level governance framework, while widely regarded as the dominant theoretical approach to studying cross-border cooperation (CBC) in Western Europe, proves significantly less applicable when extended beyond the European context. We argue that in combination with Comparative Area Studies approaches, reconciling cognitive and material perspectives may better accommodate non-Western CBC and identify Analytic Eclecticism and Practice Theory as promising avenues for a global, but at the same time decentred, theory-building on CBC. Methodologically, we opt for inductive and abductive qualitative approaches and Qualitative Comparative Analysis.

Beyond Eurocentrism: Globalising and Decentring Research on Micro-Regional Cross-Border Cooperation

Nadalutti E.
Primo
;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Research on cross-border micro-regionalism has proliferated in the last three decades. Much of this research is undertheorized and Eurocentric in outlook. Addressing this problem, our article follows calls to establish a Global International Relations research perspective that also incorporates non-Western cultural traditions and historical trajectories in theory building. We demonstrate that Hooghe and Marks's multi-level governance framework, while widely regarded as the dominant theoretical approach to studying cross-border cooperation (CBC) in Western Europe, proves significantly less applicable when extended beyond the European context. We argue that in combination with Comparative Area Studies approaches, reconciling cognitive and material perspectives may better accommodate non-Western CBC and identify Analytic Eclecticism and Practice Theory as promising avenues for a global, but at the same time decentred, theory-building on CBC. Methodologically, we opt for inductive and abductive qualitative approaches and Qualitative Comparative Analysis.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Geopolitics 2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 877.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
877.94 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/1321026
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact