Nominalisation is a central device for packaging clausal information into noun phrases, thereby increasing clausal density and enabling the abstraction typical of academic prose. This article reports a pilot corpus study of nominalisation types across four English register samples drawn from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the British National Corpus (BNC): Academic, Spoken, and Fiction. Using formal diagnostics from generative work on nominalisations (Picallo 1991; Baker & Vinokurova 2009) as an annotation guide, but adopting a corpus-register perspective for explanation (Biber et al. 1999; Nichols 1989), 500 tokens were manually classified as Event nominalisations, Agent nominalisations, or complex nominal constructions. The results show a robust register contrast within this stratified sample: Academic writing overwhelmingly favours eventive nominalisations (about 80%), while spoken and fiction samples favour agentive nominals and show more surface noun-phrase complexity. A chi-square test confirms that the association between register group (academic vs non-academic) and nominal type is large in the sample. The discussion interprets these patterns as register-conditioned preferences for conceptual reification and agent suppression, while also foregrounding the theoretical and methodological limits of using corpus distributions as evidence for formal grammatical architecture.
Event and Agent Nominalisations Across Academic, Spoken, and Fiction Registers in Contemporary English: A Pilot Corpus Study of Clausal Density
Komninos, Nickolas
2026-01-01
Abstract
Nominalisation is a central device for packaging clausal information into noun phrases, thereby increasing clausal density and enabling the abstraction typical of academic prose. This article reports a pilot corpus study of nominalisation types across four English register samples drawn from the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the British National Corpus (BNC): Academic, Spoken, and Fiction. Using formal diagnostics from generative work on nominalisations (Picallo 1991; Baker & Vinokurova 2009) as an annotation guide, but adopting a corpus-register perspective for explanation (Biber et al. 1999; Nichols 1989), 500 tokens were manually classified as Event nominalisations, Agent nominalisations, or complex nominal constructions. The results show a robust register contrast within this stratified sample: Academic writing overwhelmingly favours eventive nominalisations (about 80%), while spoken and fiction samples favour agentive nominals and show more surface noun-phrase complexity. A chi-square test confirms that the association between register group (academic vs non-academic) and nominal type is large in the sample. The discussion interprets these patterns as register-conditioned preferences for conceptual reification and agent suppression, while also foregrounding the theoretical and methodological limits of using corpus distributions as evidence for formal grammatical architecture.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
23561-76239-1-PB.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Event and Agent Nominalisations Across Academic, Spoken, and Fiction Registers in Contemporary English
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
116.2 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
116.2 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


