Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is highly susceptible to weed competition, yet chemical and mechanical control options remain limited. Intercropping with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) offers a potential agroecological alternative, but its effectiveness across environments and cultivars remains poorly understood. A three-year field experiment was conducted at two Italian sites (Pisa and Udine) comparing six chickpea cultivars grown as mechanically weeded sole crops or intercropped with common wheat. Weed suppression, floristic composition, and taxonomic and functional weed diversity indices were assessed at crop flowering. Eleven functional traits were retrieved from databases; however, as no literature value was available, a novel field-measured Specific Leaf Area (SLA) value for Cyperus rotundus L. was determined. Intercropping reduced weed biomass by 57%–70% in Pisa and performed comparably to mechanical weeding in Udine, where high weed pressure prevailed. Desi-type cultivars (Castor, Nero della Murgia) and Lambada showed better weed control than the other Kabuli cultivars. Weed community composition in intercropped plots closely resembled that of sole-crop wheat, identifying the cereal as the dominant biotic filter. Intercropping preserved weed species richness and exerted only targeted, cultivar-dependent effects on specific functional traits. Chickpea–wheat intercropping can be a viable component of Integrated Weed Management, providing effective weed suppression while maintaining community diversity. Multi-year, long-term studies and breeding programmes targeting competitive cultivars are needed to fully harness the agroecological potential of intercropping systems.

Chickpea-Wheat Intercropping Improves Weed Control and Shapes Weed Community Composition but Effects on Community Functional Traits Are Cultivar and Site-Dependent

Alessandra, Virili;Elisa, Marraccini;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is highly susceptible to weed competition, yet chemical and mechanical control options remain limited. Intercropping with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) offers a potential agroecological alternative, but its effectiveness across environments and cultivars remains poorly understood. A three-year field experiment was conducted at two Italian sites (Pisa and Udine) comparing six chickpea cultivars grown as mechanically weeded sole crops or intercropped with common wheat. Weed suppression, floristic composition, and taxonomic and functional weed diversity indices were assessed at crop flowering. Eleven functional traits were retrieved from databases; however, as no literature value was available, a novel field-measured Specific Leaf Area (SLA) value for Cyperus rotundus L. was determined. Intercropping reduced weed biomass by 57%–70% in Pisa and performed comparably to mechanical weeding in Udine, where high weed pressure prevailed. Desi-type cultivars (Castor, Nero della Murgia) and Lambada showed better weed control than the other Kabuli cultivars. Weed community composition in intercropped plots closely resembled that of sole-crop wheat, identifying the cereal as the dominant biotic filter. Intercropping preserved weed species richness and exerted only targeted, cultivar-dependent effects on specific functional traits. Chickpea–wheat intercropping can be a viable component of Integrated Weed Management, providing effective weed suppression while maintaining community diversity. Multi-year, long-term studies and breeding programmes targeting competitive cultivars are needed to fully harness the agroecological potential of intercropping systems.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Weed Research - 2026 - Nerucci - Chickpea‐Wheat Intercropping Improves Weed Control and Shapes Weed Community Composition.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.64 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.64 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/1343505
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact