BACKGROUND: Difficult airways present a clinical challenge for anaesthetists. The Truphatek Truview EVO2 (Truphatek International Ltd, Netanya, Israel) is a new laryngoscope blade used for endotracheal intubation that could be used where there is difficulty in visualizing the laryngeal inlet. METHODS: Twenty anaesthetists (12 trainees and eight consultants) compared the Truphatek Truview EVO2 with a conventional Macintosh size 3 blade. The Trucorp Airsim Bronchi (Trucorp Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK) manikin was intubated under normal conditions and under simulated difficult conditions such as tongue inflation and neck rigidity. In each scenario, the Cormack-Lehane grade, time needed for successful intubation, perceived difficulty of tracheal intubation and personal preference of blade were compared. The results were analysed with t-test (time of intubation), Wilcoxon signed-rank sum (Cormack-Lehane grade, ease of manoeuvre, preferred blade) and analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction (augmentation of difficulties in different scenarios). RESULTS: The Truview EVO2 blade allowed the best laryngeal view as judged by the Cormack-Lehane grade (P < 0.05) in two separate situations: under simulated tongue inflation and under simulated neck rigidity. However, this blade did not reduce the intubation time or the ease of tracheal tube placement with respect to conventional Macintosh blade. CONCLUSION: Compared with the classical Macintosh blade, the Truview EVO2 blade allowed a better view of the larynx, but did not facilitate endotracheal intubation in any of the difficult scenarios created with the adjustable manikin and in most scenarios in fact prolonged the intubation time.

“Evaluation of new laryngoscope blade for tracheal intubation. Truview EVO2: a manikin study.”

DELLA ROCCA, Giorgio
2008-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Difficult airways present a clinical challenge for anaesthetists. The Truphatek Truview EVO2 (Truphatek International Ltd, Netanya, Israel) is a new laryngoscope blade used for endotracheal intubation that could be used where there is difficulty in visualizing the laryngeal inlet. METHODS: Twenty anaesthetists (12 trainees and eight consultants) compared the Truphatek Truview EVO2 with a conventional Macintosh size 3 blade. The Trucorp Airsim Bronchi (Trucorp Ltd, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK) manikin was intubated under normal conditions and under simulated difficult conditions such as tongue inflation and neck rigidity. In each scenario, the Cormack-Lehane grade, time needed for successful intubation, perceived difficulty of tracheal intubation and personal preference of blade were compared. The results were analysed with t-test (time of intubation), Wilcoxon signed-rank sum (Cormack-Lehane grade, ease of manoeuvre, preferred blade) and analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction (augmentation of difficulties in different scenarios). RESULTS: The Truview EVO2 blade allowed the best laryngeal view as judged by the Cormack-Lehane grade (P < 0.05) in two separate situations: under simulated tongue inflation and under simulated neck rigidity. However, this blade did not reduce the intubation time or the ease of tracheal tube placement with respect to conventional Macintosh blade. CONCLUSION: Compared with the classical Macintosh blade, the Truview EVO2 blade allowed a better view of the larynx, but did not facilitate endotracheal intubation in any of the difficult scenarios created with the adjustable manikin and in most scenarios in fact prolonged the intubation time.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Miceli - EJA 2008.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 79.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
79.89 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/852266
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact