The aims of the present study were to develop and cross-validate new equations for predicting resting energy expenditure (PREE) in severely obese Italian women, and to compare their accuracy with those of the Harris-Benedict, Bernstein, WHO/FAO/UNU, Owen, Mifflin, Nelson, Siervo, Huang and Livingston equations to predict REE, using the Bland-Altman method. One hundred and eighty two women [mean body mass index (BMI) 45.6 kg/m2; 56.7% fat mass (FM)], aged 19 to 60 yr participated in this study. REE was measured by indirect calorimetry and body composition by bioelectrical analysis. Equations were derived by stepwise multiple regression analysis, using a calibration group and tested against the validation group. Two new specific equations based on anthropometric REE=Weightx0.042+Heightx3.619-2.678 (R2=0.66, SE=0.56 MJ) or body composition parameters REE=FFMx0.067+FMx0.046+1.568 (R2=0.63, SE=0.58 MJ) were generated. Mean PREE were no different from the mean measured resting energy expenditure (MREE) (<1%, p>0.800) and REE was predicted accurately (95-105% of MREE) in 60% of subjects. The WHO/FAO/UNU, Harris-Benedict and Siervo equations showed mean differences <2% and PREE was accurate in <44% of subjects. The Huang, Mifflin and Livingston equations showed a mean PREE underestimation (>5.0%, p<0.001) and PREE was accurate in <38% of subjects. The Owen, Bernstein and Nelson equations showed a greater PREE underestimation (>14%, p<0.001) in >90% of subjects. The new prediction equations allow an accurate estimation of REE in groups of severely obese women and result in lower mean differences and lower limits of agreement between PREE and MREE than commonly used equations.

Prediction of resting energy expenditure in severely obese Italian women

LAZZER, Stefano;
2007-01-01

Abstract

The aims of the present study were to develop and cross-validate new equations for predicting resting energy expenditure (PREE) in severely obese Italian women, and to compare their accuracy with those of the Harris-Benedict, Bernstein, WHO/FAO/UNU, Owen, Mifflin, Nelson, Siervo, Huang and Livingston equations to predict REE, using the Bland-Altman method. One hundred and eighty two women [mean body mass index (BMI) 45.6 kg/m2; 56.7% fat mass (FM)], aged 19 to 60 yr participated in this study. REE was measured by indirect calorimetry and body composition by bioelectrical analysis. Equations were derived by stepwise multiple regression analysis, using a calibration group and tested against the validation group. Two new specific equations based on anthropometric REE=Weightx0.042+Heightx3.619-2.678 (R2=0.66, SE=0.56 MJ) or body composition parameters REE=FFMx0.067+FMx0.046+1.568 (R2=0.63, SE=0.58 MJ) were generated. Mean PREE were no different from the mean measured resting energy expenditure (MREE) (<1%, p>0.800) and REE was predicted accurately (95-105% of MREE) in 60% of subjects. The WHO/FAO/UNU, Harris-Benedict and Siervo equations showed mean differences <2% and PREE was accurate in <44% of subjects. The Huang, Mifflin and Livingston equations showed a mean PREE underestimation (>5.0%, p<0.001) and PREE was accurate in <38% of subjects. The Owen, Bernstein and Nelson equations showed a greater PREE underestimation (>14%, p<0.001) in >90% of subjects. The new prediction equations allow an accurate estimation of REE in groups of severely obese women and result in lower mean differences and lower limits of agreement between PREE and MREE than commonly used equations.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JEI1-2007.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Abstract
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 696.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
696.99 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/853523
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 49
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 48
social impact