Abstract BACKGROUND: Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, even those not presenting severe neuromotor sequelae, continue to be at risk of developing multiple, complex disorders involving the cognitive, emotional and behavioural domains. Follow-up protocols are able, in the short term, to identify subjects at risk of developing major sequelae, however they fail to identify all children at risk of developing disorders. AIMS: To investigate the cognitive, neuropsychological and behavioural outcomes of a sample of ELBW children at the age of four years in order to identify characteristic profiles. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SUBJECTS: 16 healthy ELBW children born in 2005 and followed up until the age of four. OUTCOME MEASURE: Performances on standardised tests evaluating intelligence, memory, cognitive visual functions, attention, and executive functions. RESULTS: General intelligence was within normal range. Cognitive profile showed mild or moderate deficits with different levels of involvement in many of the examined functions, in particular executive functions, attention and naming. CONCLUSION: There emerged a wide-ranging spectrum of weaknesses and deficits involving all the functions examined, which together give rise to a dysexecutive syndrome. Analysis of cognitive profiles showed that the sample could be divided into two subgroups of subjects that differ in the quality of their global cognitive and behavioural functioning. Our results confirm the need to continue follow up of ELBW children until school age, as this will allow early detection of at-risk children and the planning of timely preventive interventions.

Outcome of extremely low birth weight infants: What's new in the third millennium? Neuropsychological profiles at four years.

URGESI, Cosimo;FABBRO, Franco;
2012-01-01

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, even those not presenting severe neuromotor sequelae, continue to be at risk of developing multiple, complex disorders involving the cognitive, emotional and behavioural domains. Follow-up protocols are able, in the short term, to identify subjects at risk of developing major sequelae, however they fail to identify all children at risk of developing disorders. AIMS: To investigate the cognitive, neuropsychological and behavioural outcomes of a sample of ELBW children at the age of four years in order to identify characteristic profiles. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SUBJECTS: 16 healthy ELBW children born in 2005 and followed up until the age of four. OUTCOME MEASURE: Performances on standardised tests evaluating intelligence, memory, cognitive visual functions, attention, and executive functions. RESULTS: General intelligence was within normal range. Cognitive profile showed mild or moderate deficits with different levels of involvement in many of the examined functions, in particular executive functions, attention and naming. CONCLUSION: There emerged a wide-ranging spectrum of weaknesses and deficits involving all the functions examined, which together give rise to a dysexecutive syndrome. Analysis of cognitive profiles showed that the sample could be divided into two subgroups of subjects that differ in the quality of their global cognitive and behavioural functioning. Our results confirm the need to continue follow up of ELBW children until school age, as this will allow early detection of at-risk children and the planning of timely preventive interventions.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2012_EHD_Olivieri et al..pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 272.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
272.23 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/869829
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact