Background. Very preterm birth affects language development. Recent studies have highlighted that these difficulties concern acquisition and consolidation of both lexical skills and grammar, leaving open questions about differences in receptive and expressive skills. By contrast, very few studies have analysed phonological skills at the end of preschool age. Aims. To compare phonological, lexical and grammar skills of very preterm children (gestational age <32 weeks) with those of typically developing children at age 5, investigating potential differences in receptive and expressive skills, assessing whether difficulties are specific or related to non-verbal cognitive development, and analysing relationships among language skills. Method. One hundred and six monolingual Italian children were assessed at age 5 (29 very preterm children compared to 77 typically developing children) through a standardized battery of language (BVL 4-12, Marini et al., in press) and Raven’s coloured progressive matrices (CMP, Raven, 1947). Results. Very preterm children showed difficulties in verbal auditory discrimination and lexical skills (both lexical comprehension and naming) at age 5. Difficulties in receptive and expressive lexicon persisted when controlling for non-verbal cognitive development. The analysis of partial correlations showed similar patterns of relationships in preterm and typically developing children with a slight difference in the magnitude. Conclusions. The present study highlights the importance of analysing both receptive and expressive language skills at the end of preschool in children born preterm, providing valuable insights for planning effective and targeted follow-up for very preterm children.

Phonology, lexicon and grammar in very preterm children at 5 years

MARINI, Andrea
2015-01-01

Abstract

Background. Very preterm birth affects language development. Recent studies have highlighted that these difficulties concern acquisition and consolidation of both lexical skills and grammar, leaving open questions about differences in receptive and expressive skills. By contrast, very few studies have analysed phonological skills at the end of preschool age. Aims. To compare phonological, lexical and grammar skills of very preterm children (gestational age <32 weeks) with those of typically developing children at age 5, investigating potential differences in receptive and expressive skills, assessing whether difficulties are specific or related to non-verbal cognitive development, and analysing relationships among language skills. Method. One hundred and six monolingual Italian children were assessed at age 5 (29 very preterm children compared to 77 typically developing children) through a standardized battery of language (BVL 4-12, Marini et al., in press) and Raven’s coloured progressive matrices (CMP, Raven, 1947). Results. Very preterm children showed difficulties in verbal auditory discrimination and lexical skills (both lexical comprehension and naming) at age 5. Difficulties in receptive and expressive lexicon persisted when controlling for non-verbal cognitive development. The analysis of partial correlations showed similar patterns of relationships in preterm and typically developing children with a slight difference in the magnitude. Conclusions. The present study highlights the importance of analysing both receptive and expressive language skills at the end of preschool in children born preterm, providing valuable insights for planning effective and targeted follow-up for very preterm children.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Guarini et al., 2013 RIPLA AM17Mag2013.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 241.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
241.82 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/876215
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact