In this paper we wish to present some antinomies that arise in the analysis of urban-rural relations. First of all: are we to give a norm or simply to describe what happens? Second: the fight between res extensa, territory, and res cogitans, nets and knots. Third: the contrast between the theory of Central Places and the Reticular theory. And then the study of the form of boundaries between urban and rural: are they minimizing paths or tend to become fractals so long as possible?
ANTINOMIE URBANO RURALE
CHANG, Ting Fa Margherita;ISEPPI, Luca;PICCININI, Livio Clemente
2010-01-01
Abstract
In this paper we wish to present some antinomies that arise in the analysis of urban-rural relations. First of all: are we to give a norm or simply to describe what happens? Second: the fight between res extensa, territory, and res cogitans, nets and knots. Third: the contrast between the theory of Central Places and the Reticular theory. And then the study of the form of boundaries between urban and rural: are they minimizing paths or tend to become fractals so long as possible?File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
