On may 11th 2010 the french Cour de Cassation awarded some workers with compensation for the “préjudice d’anxiété”, linked to the fear of contracting in the future an asbestos related disease. The article is dedicated to one of the most discussed aspects of the asbestos problem: that of the rights of asymptomatic workers which have been exposed but have not (yet) evidence of an asbestos related disease. Many people are affected by one of the several asbestos related disease (asbestosis, mesothelioma); many more complain about the fear of contracting such a disease in the future. Their requests are labeled – in the different countries –as “préjudice d’anxiété”, “increased risk”; “emotional distress”; “danno morale”, “danno esistenziale” and so on. Limited resources, and possible conflicts between categories of victims (current and future), create serious dilemmas for legislators, judges and scholars and show the limits of civil liability rules in this particular area of mass torts, suggesting the opportunity of shaping public welfare intervention.

Esposizione ad amianto e danno da pericolo: qualche riflessione dopo la pronuncia della Cour del cassation sul préjudice d'anxiété

GAUDINO, Luigi
2010-01-01

Abstract

On may 11th 2010 the french Cour de Cassation awarded some workers with compensation for the “préjudice d’anxiété”, linked to the fear of contracting in the future an asbestos related disease. The article is dedicated to one of the most discussed aspects of the asbestos problem: that of the rights of asymptomatic workers which have been exposed but have not (yet) evidence of an asbestos related disease. Many people are affected by one of the several asbestos related disease (asbestosis, mesothelioma); many more complain about the fear of contracting such a disease in the future. Their requests are labeled – in the different countries –as “préjudice d’anxiété”, “increased risk”; “emotional distress”; “danno morale”, “danno esistenziale” and so on. Limited resources, and possible conflicts between categories of victims (current and future), create serious dilemmas for legislators, judges and scholars and show the limits of civil liability rules in this particular area of mass torts, suggesting the opportunity of shaping public welfare intervention.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
RCP 12 2010.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Non pubblico
Dimensione 323.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
323.56 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11390/881538
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact