CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System
IRIS è la piattaforma adottata dall’Università degli Studi di Udine per gestire l’archivio aperto dei prodotti della ricerca. L’archivio contiene articoli, contributi in volume, monografie, interventi pubblicati in atti di convegno, Tesi di dottorato e altri materiali.
EnglishIn this study, we examined the hypothesis that the reported sex difference in hepatic free fatty acid (FFA) uptake involves the putative FFA transport system, the plasma membrane fatty acid binding protein (FABP(pm)). In hepatocytes isolated from both male and female rats, initial [H-3]oleate uptake velocity reflected transmembrane influx and not subsequent metabolism and was a saturable function of the unbound oleate concentration. Although V(max) values were similar (61 +/-2 vs. 65 +/- 5 pmol.min-1.5 x 10(4) cells-1 for females and males, respectively), the apparent K(m) was significantly smaller in females (40 +/- 4 vs. 90 +/- 11 nM; P < 0.05), reflecting faster influx velocities in female cells over a range of unbound oleate concentrations. The oleate efflux rate constant was also greater in females (0.280 +/- 0.014 vs. 0.198 +/- 0.020 min-1; P < 0.05) despite their greater hepatic content of cytosolic FABP. Finally, despite the greater rates of transmembrane FFA flux in female hepatocytes, the surface expression of FABP(pm) was virtually identical in the two sexes (2.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.4 mug/10(6) cells). Collectively, these data indicate that at FFA-to-albumin ratios occurring in vivo the plasma membrane of female hepatocytes transports oleate bidirectionally at a greater rate than that of male hepatocytes. A sex-related difference in the functional affinity of FABP(pm) for FFA appears the most likely explanation for the greater oleate uptake in females.
Sex differences in hepatic fatty acid uptake reflect a greater affinity of the transport system in females / Sorrentino, D.R.; Zhou S-L.; Kokkotou, E.; Berk, P.D.. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9513. - 263:3(1992), pp. 380-385.
| Titolo: | Sex differences in hepatic fatty acid uptake reflect a greater affinity of the transport system in females |
| Autori: | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 1992 |
| Rivista: | |
| Citazione: | Sex differences in hepatic fatty acid uptake reflect a greater affinity of the transport system in females / Sorrentino, D.R.; Zhou S-L.; Kokkotou, E.; Berk, P.D.. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY. - ISSN 0002-9513. - 263:3(1992), pp. 380-385. |
| Abstract: | In this study, we examined the hypothesis that the reported sex difference in hepatic free fatty acid (FFA) uptake involves the putative FFA transport system, the plasma membrane fatty acid binding protein (FABP(pm)). In hepatocytes isolated from both male and female rats, initial [H-3]oleate uptake velocity reflected transmembrane influx and not subsequent metabolism and was a saturable function of the unbound oleate concentration. Although V(max) values were similar (61 +/-2 vs. 65 +/- 5 pmol.min-1.5 x 10(4) cells-1 for females and males, respectively), the apparent K(m) was significantly smaller in females (40 +/- 4 vs. 90 +/- 11 nM; P < 0.05), reflecting faster influx velocities in female cells over a range of unbound oleate concentrations. The oleate efflux rate constant was also greater in females (0.280 +/- 0.014 vs. 0.198 +/- 0.020 min-1; P < 0.05) despite their greater hepatic content of cytosolic FABP. Finally, despite the greater rates of transmembrane FFA flux in female hepatocytes, the surface expression of FABP(pm) was virtually identical in the two sexes (2.5 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.4 mug/10(6) cells). Collectively, these data indicate that at FFA-to-albumin ratios occurring in vivo the plasma membrane of female hepatocytes transports oleate bidirectionally at a greater rate than that of male hepatocytes. A sex-related difference in the functional affinity of FABP(pm) for FFA appears the most likely explanation for the greater oleate uptake in females. |
| Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11390/670181 |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
http://hdl.handle.net/11390/670181
Copyright © 2020