CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System
IRIS è la piattaforma adottata dall’Università degli Studi di Udine per gestire l’archivio aperto dei prodotti della ricerca. L’archivio contiene articoli, contributi in volume, monografie, interventi pubblicati in atti di convegno, Tesi di dottorato e altri materiali.
EnglishWe compared the clinical and quality of life related outcome of rotator cuff repair performed using either a mini-open or an arthroscopic technique for rotator cuff tears of less than 3 cm. The records of 64 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair between September 2003 and September 2005 were evaluated. Thirty-two patients underwent a mini-open rotator cuff repair, and 32 patients underwent an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The mean follow-up period was 31 months in the mini-open group and 30.6 months in the arthroscopic group (P > 0.05). The UCLA rating system, range of motion examination and the self-administered SF-36 used for postoperative evaluation showed a statistically significant improvement from the preoperative to the final score for both groups (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference in the total UCLA scores was found when comparing the two repair techniques (P > 0.05). This study suggests that there is no difference in terms of subjective and objective outcomes between the two surgical procedures studied if patients have rotator cuff tears of less than 3 cm.
Arthroscopic vs mini-open rotator cuff repair. A quality of life impairment study. / Osti L; Papalia R; Paganelli M; Denaro E; Maffulli N. - In: INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS. - ISSN 0341-2695. - 34:3(2010), pp. 389-394.
| Titolo: | Arthroscopic vs mini-open rotator cuff repair. A quality of life impairment study. |
| Autori: | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2010 |
| Rivista: | |
| Citazione: | Arthroscopic vs mini-open rotator cuff repair. A quality of life impairment study. / Osti L; Papalia R; Paganelli M; Denaro E; Maffulli N. - In: INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS. - ISSN 0341-2695. - 34:3(2010), pp. 389-394. |
| Abstract: | We compared the clinical and quality of life related outcome of rotator cuff repair performed using either a mini-open or an arthroscopic technique for rotator cuff tears of less than 3 cm. The records of 64 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair between September 2003 and September 2005 were evaluated. Thirty-two patients underwent a mini-open rotator cuff repair, and 32 patients underwent an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The mean follow-up period was 31 months in the mini-open group and 30.6 months in the arthroscopic group (P > 0.05). The UCLA rating system, range of motion examination and the self-administered SF-36 used for postoperative evaluation showed a statistically significant improvement from the preoperative to the final score for both groups (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference in the total UCLA scores was found when comparing the two repair techniques (P > 0.05). This study suggests that there is no difference in terms of subjective and objective outcomes between the two surgical procedures studied if patients have rotator cuff tears of less than 3 cm. |
| Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11390/863169 |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthroscopic Vùvs mini-open rotator cuff repair....pdf | Altro materiale allegato | Non pubblico | Accesso ristretto |
http://hdl.handle.net/11390/863169
Copyright © 2020